Grimmjow-V.L
Banned
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
- Messages
- 1,984
- Reaction score
- 193
- Points
- 0
I think that an abortion is a double moral by a woman or by the man supporting it, it exist enough mothers which were victims from rape situations who decided to not abort their child despite such misfortune, capable of finding happiness above their children, now if you go to those successful mothers and ask them if it would have been better to kill their child before, what do you think they would answer? if it exists successful mothers after such cases why other mothers not? should weakness be a pretext to deprive another life? because it's possible to defeat such cases.
The second point is that it's contradictory to say that someone is going to dictate what should be done inside a woman when in fact the woman is dictating the annihilation of the upcoming life which had 0 blame about such accident/misfortune.
The third point is that, to say that a fetus isn't considered as one human during the first three months is like literally saying that a human under vegetative state after an accident isn't a human as well imo.
If it should be right to kill a fetus why should the humanity protect/consider forests, plants? I mean a fetus during the first three months is a more complex organism with the opportunity to develop himself, we can thank our forests that we exist that's why we made laws to protect our flora and fauna in many parts of the world, a fetus isn't productive in the moment, but what could the fetus do in the future for the humanity or its environment? a double moral again isn't it?
It's fair to decide the life of others based on ignorance or hunches?
The second point is that it's contradictory to say that someone is going to dictate what should be done inside a woman when in fact the woman is dictating the annihilation of the upcoming life which had 0 blame about such accident/misfortune.
The third point is that, to say that a fetus isn't considered as one human during the first three months is like literally saying that a human under vegetative state after an accident isn't a human as well imo.
If it should be right to kill a fetus why should the humanity protect/consider forests, plants? I mean a fetus during the first three months is a more complex organism with the opportunity to develop himself, we can thank our forests that we exist that's why we made laws to protect our flora and fauna in many parts of the world, a fetus isn't productive in the moment, but what could the fetus do in the future for the humanity or its environment? a double moral again isn't it?
It's fair to decide the life of others based on ignorance or hunches?
Last edited:
